Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 61.9 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | LG |
| Android 4.1 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.24 x 2.62 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.69 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green, White and Yellow | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Xiaolong S4 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1700 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 320 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.55 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 4.4 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.48 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2030mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is way better than the Xiaomi MI-2a, getting an 83.7 score against 61.9. The LG V50 ThinQ body is somewhat thinner but extremely heavier than Xiaomi MI-2a. Both devices in this review use Android OS (operating system), but the LG V50 ThinQ has a newer 10 version while Xiaomi MI-2a has Android 4.1.
The LG V50 ThinQ features just a bit better screen than Xiaomi MI-2a, because it has a lot greater screen pixels density, a way larger display and a lot higher 1440 x 3120 resolution. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a faster processor than Xiaomi MI-2a, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a larger number of cores and 5 GB more RAM.
LG V50 ThinQ captures greater photos and videos than Xiaomi MI-2a, because it has a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a much more MP camera. The LG V50 ThinQ features much more memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi MI-2a, because it has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory.
LG V50 ThinQ features a much better battery performance than Xiaomi MI-2a, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
LG V50 ThinQ is not only the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone, making this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.