Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 65.1 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 4.1 | Android 4.0 |
| 0000-00-00 | 0000-00-00 |
| 4.96 x 2.44 x 0.40 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 169.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 342 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| Krait 300 (Quad-Core 1700 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 320 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.82 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.4 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (90 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 8.36 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| SIM | Micro SIM |
| 4.6 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 15 hours talk time | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 3.92 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S III Cricket has an overall score of 71.5, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi-2S's 65.1 score. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S III Cricket has the previous 4.0 version while Xiaomi Mi-2S has Android 4.1. The Galaxy S III Cricket is a just a little lighter and somewhat thinner cellphone than Xiaomi Mi-2S.
The Xiaomi Mi-2S counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S III Cricket, and although they both have a 400 megahertz graphics processor and a 2 GB RAM memory, the Xiaomi Mi-2S also has a larger number of cores (and also faster). The Xiaomi Mi-2S features a little bit better screen than Galaxy S III Cricket, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1280 x 720px, the Xiaomi Mi-2S also counts with a just a bit greater pixels quantity per inch in the display.
Galaxy S III Cricket has a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Mi-2S, although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light captures, they both have a back facing camera with an 8 MP, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video quality. The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket has a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi-2S, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 64 GB and 16 GB more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy S III Cricket features just a bit better battery life than Xiaomi Mi-2S, because it has a 5% bigger battery size.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.