Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.2.1 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 0000-00-00 | 2019-10-20 |
| 5.67 x 2.90 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 8974-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2360 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s is way better than the Xiaomi Mi-3, having a score of 86.6 against 71.6. Both phones in this comparison have Android operating system, but Galaxy A50s has older 10 version while Xiaomi Mi-3 has Android 4.4.2 version. The Galaxy A50s is a somewhat heavier but just a little thinner phone than the Xiaomi Mi-3.
Xiaomi Mi-3 has a better display than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a way smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, it also counts with a little bit higher screen pixel density. The Galaxy A50s counts with a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi-3, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with more cpu cores (but slower) and more RAM memory.
Galaxy A50s features a greater camera than Xiaomi Mi-3, because it has a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels, a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light images and videos and a much higher (4K) video resolution. The Galaxy A50s features a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi-3, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 512 GB and more internal storage.
The Galaxy A50s has improved battery duration than Xiaomi Mi-3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.