Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.2.1 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 0000-00-00 | 2019-09-27 |
| 5.67 x 2.90 x 0.32 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| $ 300.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 8974-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2360 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is a lot better than the Xiaomi Mi-3, getting a 97.6 score against 71.6. The Samsung Galaxy Fold design is much heavier but somewhat thinner than the Xiaomi Mi-3. Both phones we are comparing here work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has 9.0 Pie version and Xiaomi Mi-3 has Android 4.4.2, providing lots of additional features and better performance.
The Xiaomi Mi-3 counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a way worse 1920 x 1080 resolution and a way smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen. The Galaxy Fold has a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Mi-3, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with 10 GB more RAM and a larger number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi-3, because it has more internal memory. Galaxy Fold shoots better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi-3, because although it has a camera with a lower 12 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a much better video definition and a lot larger aperture.
Galaxy Fold features a way better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi-3, because it has a 44 percent more battery size.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Xiaomi Mi-3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xiaomi Mi-3. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the Xiaomi Mi-3, and give up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.