Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.2.1 | Android 14 |
| 0000-00-00 | -- |
| 5.67 x 2.90 x 0.32 inches | -- |
| 5.11 ounces | -- |
| Black | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 8974-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2360 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 is better than Xiaomi Mi-3, with a global score of 82.6 against 71.6. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S25 has the previous 14 version and Xiaomi Mi-3 has Android 4.4.2. Galaxy S25 is a a lot thinner and much lighter phone than the Xiaomi Mi-3. Xiaomi Mi-3 has a way better processing power than Galaxy S25, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and less cpu cores , it also counts with a graphics processor.
Samsung Galaxy S25 has just a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi-3, because although it has a bit worse amount of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a bigger screen. The Samsung Galaxy S25 takes much better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi-3, because it has a bigger camera aperture to take better low light photos and video, a back facing camera with lot more MP and a way higher video quality.
The Galaxy S25 counts with a very superior storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi-3, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy S25 counts with better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi-3, because it has a 31% greater battery size.
Although Galaxy S25 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Xiaomi Mi-3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xiaomi Mi-3. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Galaxy S25, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Xiaomi Mi-3, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.