Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.2.1 | Android 14 |
| 0000-00-00 | -- |
| 5.67 x 2.90 x 0.32 inches | -- |
| 5.11 ounces | -- |
| Black | -- |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 8974-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2360 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra is a lot better than the Xiaomi Mi-3, having a overall score of 90.7 against 71.6. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has older 14 version and Xiaomi Mi-3 has Android 4.4.2. Galaxy S25 Ultra is a extremely lighter and incredibly thinner phone than the Xiaomi Mi-3.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a better screen than Xiaomi Mi-3, because it has a just a little more pixels per inch in the display, a lot better 1440 x 3088 resolution and a way bigger screen. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a very superior memory for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi-3, because it has 192 GB more internal memory.
Xiaomi Mi-3 counts with a much greater hardware performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has 10 GB lesser RAM and 4 less cpu cores , it also counts with an additional graphics processor. Galaxy S25 Ultra has a very superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi-3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy S25 Ultra takes way better photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi-3, because it has a back camera with a way better resolution, a way better video quality and a way larger camera aperture to capture better photos in poorly lited environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.