Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.2.1 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 0000-00-00 | 2016-03-11 |
| 5.67 x 2.90 x 0.32 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 8974-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2360 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 edge is a bit better than Xiaomi Mi-3, having a global score of 78.1 against 71.6. The Galaxy S7 edge is a a little bit heavier but just a little bit thinner phone than Xiaomi Mi-3. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S7 edge has the newer 8.0 Oreo version while Xiaomi Mi-3 has Android 4.4.2, so it gives a couple nice extra features and performance improvements.
Xiaomi Mi-3 has a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, although it has a bit smaller display, a little bit worse pixel density and a lot worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels. Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi-3, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 200 GB.
Xiaomi Mi-3 features a little better processing power than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have 4 cores, the Xiaomi Mi-3 also counts with a graphics processing unit. Samsung Galaxy S7 edge captures a bit better videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi-3, because although it has a camera in the back with less MP resolution, it also counts with a way higher (4K) video quality and a way bigger camera aperture.
Galaxy S7 edge features better battery performance than Xiaomi Mi-3, because it has a 3600mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy S7 edge costs a little more than the Xiaomi Mi-3, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.