Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.2.1 | Android 10 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2020-05-05 |
| 5.67 x 2.90 x 0.32 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 8974-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2360 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is much better than the Xiaomi Mi-3, getting an 81.1 score against 71.6. These phones come with Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has 10 version and Xiaomi Mi-3 has Android 4.4.2 version. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's construction is a bit thicker and much heavier than the Xiaomi Mi-3.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a little faster processor than Xiaomi Mi-3, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with more RAM memory and more cpu cores. The Xiaomi Mi-3 features a better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater number of pixels per display inch.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has much more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi-3, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a very superior battery duration than Xiaomi Mi-3, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity against 3050mAh.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a much better camera than Xiaomi Mi-3, because it has a bigger aperture, a way more mega-pixels camera and a much better video quality.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also cheaper than the Xiaomi Mi-3.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.