| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | ZTE |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.2.1 | Android 11 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2021-06-04 |
| 5.67 x 2.90 x 0.32 inches | 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 8974-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2360 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 35.00mm focal length |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 10.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a score of 78.1, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Mi-3's 71.6 general score. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has 11 version and Xiaomi Mi-3 has Android 4.4.2. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra's design is notably heavier but a little thinner than the Xiaomi Mi-3.
The Xiaomi Mi-3 counts with a more vivid screen than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has a bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel quantity in each display inch. The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra features a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi-3, because it has more internal storage capacity.
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra counts with a bit faster processor than Xiaomi Mi-3, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with 6 GB more RAM memory and a higher number of cores (and they are faster). The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a way better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi-3, because it has a 51% more battery capacity.
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a greater camera than Xiaomi Mi-3, because it has a much larger aperture, a much higher 7680x4320 video quality and a lot more MP back camera.
Although ZTE Axon 30 Ultra is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Xiaomi Mi-3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xiaomi Mi-3. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Xiaomi Mi-3, giving up a couple features and specs.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.