Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android | -- |
| -- | 2019-03-08 |
| 5.55 x 2.81 x 0.20 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.29 ounces |
| -- | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 419.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.25 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 5.9 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10e is better than the Xiaomi Mi 5, with an 86.3 score against 73.7. The Xiaomi Mi 5 counts with a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel amount in each inch of screen and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440.
Galaxy S10e has a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 5, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy S10e has just a bit better performance than Xiaomi Mi 5, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with a larger number of cores and more RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Mi 5 features a little better battery performance than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 16 percent bigger battery size. The Galaxy S10e features a much better camera than Xiaomi Mi 5, because although it has a back camera with a lot worse resolution, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Samsung Galaxy S10e is also cheaper than the Xiaomi Mi 5, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.