Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.4 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| Android 7.1 Nougat | Android 14 |
| 2017-03-03 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.28 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 4.76 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Pink | Black and White |
| Metal | -- |
| $ 218.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Xiaomi Surge S1 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP4 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.4 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2860mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi 5c, having a general score of 77.8 against 72.4. Even though the vivo X Fold 3 Pro is incredibly heavier than Xiaomi Mi 5c, it's a lot thinner and newer. Both phones we compare here include Android OS, but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has 14 version and Xiaomi Mi 5c has Android 7.1 Nougat.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with an incredibly better screen than Xiaomi Mi 5c, because although it has a little lower screen density, it also counts with a lot better 2200 x 2480px resolution and a way bigger screen. The Xiaomi Mi 5c counts with a way better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 5c, because it has 512 GB internal memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 5c, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity instead of 2860mAh.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way better camera than Xiaomi Mi 5c, because it has a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition, a back facing camera with a lot better 50 MP resolution and a way bigger aperture.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Xiaomi Mi 5c, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Xiaomi Mi 5c. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Xiaomi Mi 5c, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.