Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-09-29 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.09 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver | Black and White |
| Metal | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.76 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus is a little bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with a 78.1 score against 77.8. Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus is a way older and extremely thicker device than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Xiaomi was able to make it incredibly lighter anyway. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus has the newer 6.0 Marshmallow version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version, providing a couple nice extra features.
The Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus counts with a much more powerful CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better looking display than Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus, because it has a lot larger display, a quite better pixels density, way more brightness and a lot higher 2200 x 2480 resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much greater storage for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus, because it has 384 GB more internal memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much longer battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus, because it has a 5700mAh battery size against 3800mAh. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures much clearer videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus, because it has a much larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a much better 50 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better images and video in low-light environments and a much better video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.