Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-29 | 2017-11-03 |
| 5.73 x 2.77 x 0.32 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver | Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 345.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X has a general score of 88.1, which is better than Xiaomi Mi 5s's 76.4 global score. The iPhone X design is newer and just a bit thinner, but also heavier than Xiaomi Mi 5s. IPhone X has just a bit better screen than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has a little brighter screen, a bit higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels, a quite larger screen and a little bit better pixels number per inch in the display.
The Apple iPhone X has a quite superior hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because although it has less RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit and a greater number of cores. The Apple iPhone X has a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because although it has a way tinier back-facing camera sensor capturing much worse quality pictures and videos, and they both have a same resolution camera in the back and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Apple iPhone X also counts with better video frame rates and a bigger aperture to capture better low light captures and video.
The iPhone X features much more memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Mi 5s has improved battery performance than Apple iPhone X, because it has an 18% more battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone X is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Xiaomi Mi 5s, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xiaomi Mi 5s. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the Xiaomi Mi 5s, giving up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.