Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-29 | 2018-10-26 |
| 5.73 x 2.77 x 0.32 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 345.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XR has an overall score of 82, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Mi 5s's overall score of 76.4. IPhone XR's design is notably newer than the Xiaomi Mi 5s's, although it's just a little thicker and extremely heavier. The Xiaomi Mi 5s has a bit better looking display than iPhone XR, because although it has less brightness and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 1920.
IPhone XR features a faster processor than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU and more processing cores. IPhone XR captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because although it has a smaller sensor shooting worse quality videos and photographs, and they both have the same resolution back-facing camera and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the iPhone XR also counts with a bigger aperture and better 60 fps video frame rates.
Xiaomi Mi 5s features a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than iPhone XR, because it has 64 GB more internal memory. The Xiaomi Mi 5s features just a bit longer battery life than iPhone XR, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone XR is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Xiaomi Mi 5s, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Xiaomi Mi 5s. If you want to save some money, you can get the Xiaomi Mi 5s, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.