Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-29 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.73 x 2.77 x 0.32 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver | Black, Pink and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 345.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has a general score of 80, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi 5s's 76.4 overall score. Although Google Pixel 3 is just a little bit heavier than the Xiaomi Mi 5s, it's just a little bit thinner and also extremely newer. The Xiaomi Mi 5s counts with a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3, although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 1920, a bit lower screen density and a bit smaller display.
Google Pixel 3 has a little bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi 5s, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Google Pixel 3 also has a higher number of cores. The Google Pixel 3 takes a bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor shooting lower quality videos and pictures, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Google Pixel 3 also counts with a back camera with a better 12.2 megapixels resolution and a larger aperture.
Xiaomi Mi 5s features a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because it has more internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Mi 5s has just a bit longer battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Google Pixel 3 is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.