Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-29 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.73 x 2.77 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver | Black, Pink and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 345.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL has an overall score of 80.7, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Mi 5s's 76.4 global score. The Google Pixel 3 XL design is a lot newer and just a little thinner, but also much heavier than Xiaomi Mi 5s. The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with just a bit better performance than Xiaomi Mi 5s, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Google Pixel 3 XL also has a larger number of faster cores.
Google Pixel 3 XL features a screen that is very similar to the Xiaomi Mi 5s one, although the Google Pixel 3 XL also has a larger display, a quite higher display density and a lot higher 1440 x 2960 resolution. The Xiaomi Mi 5s has a superior storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Google Pixel 3 XL takes a bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because although it has a tinier sensor shooting worse quality pictures, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Google Pixel 3 XL also counts with a back-facing camera with a better 12.2 mega-pixels resolution and a bigger aperture.
The Google Pixel 3 XL features a bit superior battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has 3430mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Google Pixel 3 XL is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.