Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-29 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.73 x 2.77 x 0.32 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 345.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 has a global score of 81.9, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi 5s's global score of 76.4. The Google Pixel 4 design has the same thickness than Xiaomi Mi 5s, but it is somewhat heavier. Google Pixel 4 counts with just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has more RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
The Xiaomi Mi 5s has a little more vivid display than Google Pixel 4, although it has a little bit smaller screen, a quite worse display density and a little lower 1080 x 1920px resolution. The Xiaomi Mi 5s has a much bigger storage for apps and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has more internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi 5s features just a little better battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 3200mAh battery size. Google Pixel 4 takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because although it has a smaller sensor shooting lower quality videos and photos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Google Pixel 4 also counts with a camera with a higher 12.2 mega pixels resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and video in low light environments.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Google Pixel 4 is also cheaper than the Xiaomi Mi 5s, making this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.