Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-29 | 2020-10-15 |
| 5.73 x 2.77 x 0.32 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Metal | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 345.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has a score of 89, which is better than Xiaomi Mi 5s's score of 76.4. Although the Google Pixel 5 is just a little heavier than Xiaomi Mi 5s, it's just a little thinner and also notably newer. The Google Pixel 5 features a little faster processor than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has 4 GB more RAM memory and more cpu cores.
The Xiaomi Mi 5s has a little bit better screen than Google Pixel 5, although it has a bit less pixels per screen inch, a quite smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 1920. Google Pixel 5 and Xiaomi Mi 5s both feature extremely similar storage capacity to store more apps and games, both have exactly the same internal storage.
The Google Pixel 5 features superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has a 28 percent larger battery size. Google Pixel 5 features a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because although it has a tinier camera sensor providing a worse image quality, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Google Pixel 5 also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to take better captures and videos in low-light situations, a back-facing camera with a higher resolution and faster video frame rate.
The Google Pixel 5 costs a lot more money than the Xiaomi Mi 5s, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.