Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-09-29 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.73 x 2.77 x 0.32 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Metal | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 345.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much better than Xiaomi Mi 5s, getting a overall score of 87.1 against 76.4. Both devices we are comparing here include Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an older 14 version and Xiaomi Mi 5s has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's design is way newer than the Xiaomi Mi 5s's, but it is extremely heavier and just a little bit thicker.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a brighter screen than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because although it has a bit lower display density, it also counts with much more brightness, a larger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi 5s has a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster) and less RAM. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a lot better camera than Xiaomi Mi 5s, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a back camera with lot more mega pixels, a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a larger camera aperture for better low-light photography and videos and higher video frame rates.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a superior battery life than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.