Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Oppo |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-09-29 | 2020-05-14 |
| 5.73 x 2.77 x 0.32 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver | Ocean |
| Metal | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 345.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 Pro is a little bit better than Xiaomi Mi 5s, getting an 83.1 score against 76.4. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but OPPO Find X2 Pro has an older 10 version while Xiaomi Mi 5s has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. OPPO Find X2 Pro's body is noticeably newer than the Xiaomi Mi 5s's, although it's incredibly heavier and just a little thicker.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features just a little better processing power than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has a higher number of cores (and they are faster) and a larger amount of RAM. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a little bit better screen than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3168px, a larger screen, a quite higher number of pixels in each inch in the screen and a brighter screen.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity. OPPO Find X2 Pro has a lot better camera than Xiaomi Mi 5s, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has higher video frame rate, a way bigger back camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and photographs, a back camera with much more MP and a larger aperture for better captures and video in low-light situations.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with superior battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has a 4260mAh battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.