Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-29 | 2020-08-07 |
| 5.73 x 2.77 x 0.32 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| $ 345.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a score of 92.3, which is way better than Xiaomi Mi 5s's score of 76.4. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G design is newer and somewhat thinner, but noticeably heavier than Xiaomi Mi 5s. These phones use Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the previous 11 version while Xiaomi Mi 5s has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
Xiaomi Mi 5s counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920px, a much smaller screen and a bit inferior pixel amount per inch of screen. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has a greater number of cores (and they are faster) and a greater amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G takes slightly better videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because although it has a tinier sensor shooting lower quality videos and pictures, and they both have a camera with a 12 mega-pixels and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also counts with higher video frame rate and a bigger diafragm aperture.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has much more storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has just a little bit longer battery life than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has a 3% greater battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G costs a lot more money than the Xiaomi Mi 5s, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.