Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.5 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| 2017-04-28 | 2018-09-21 |
| 5.72 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Glass and Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2457 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3350mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS Max is much better than the Xiaomi Mi 6, having a global score of 84.5 against 76.5. IPhone XS Max is a newer cellphone than the Xiaomi Mi 6, but it's somewhat heavier and just a little bit thicker. IPhone XS Max counts with a slightly better display than Xiaomi Mi 6, because it has a better resolution of 1242 x 2688, a little bit greater display pixel density, a larger display and a little more brightness.
IPhone XS Max features a bit superior processor than Xiaomi Mi 6, because although it has less CPU cores (although they are faster) and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU. The Xiaomi Mi 6 has a lot bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than iPhone XS Max, because it has more internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Mi 6 features just a bit better battery performance than iPhone XS Max, because it has 3350mAh of battery capacity. IPhone XS Max captures clearer photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi 6, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the same 3840x2160 video definition and a back facing camera with a 12 mega-pixels, the iPhone XS Max also has higher 60 fps video frame rates and a larger camera sensor which offers a higher image and video quality.
Although Apple iPhone XS Max is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Xiaomi Mi 6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Xiaomi Mi 6. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Apple iPhone XS Max, otherwise you can save some money and get the Xiaomi Mi 6, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.