Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.5 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| 2017-04-28 | 2015-11-02 |
| 5.72 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2457 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3350mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6P is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi 6, having a general score of 80.3 against 76.5. The Google Nexus 6P design has the same thickness than the Xiaomi Mi 6, but it's a bit heavier. Xiaomi Mi 6 counts with a bit better display than Google Nexus 6P, although it has a just a bit worse quantity of pixels per inch of display, a way lower 1080 x 1920 resolution and a quite smaller display.
Xiaomi Mi 6 features a bit superior processor than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Mi 6 also has more RAM. Google Nexus 6P and Xiaomi Mi 6 feature similar storage to store more games and applications, both have equal internal storage capacity. The Google Nexus 6P features a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi 6, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video definition, the Google Nexus 6P also counts with a more mega pixels camera in the back and a much larger sensor.
The Google Nexus 6P counts with just a bit better battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 6, because it has a 3450mAh battery size.
Although Google Nexus 6P is a better device, it costs a lot more than Xiaomi Mi 6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xiaomi Mi 6. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get the Xiaomi Mi 6, giving up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.