Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.4 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2019-04-15 | 2019-09-20 |
| 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches | 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3070mAh Battery | 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 11 Pro has an overall score of 84.9, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE's 81.4 global score. Even being the best device in this review, the iPhone 11 Pro body is just a bit thicker and heavier than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE. The iPhone 11 Pro works with iOS 15.x operating system, while Xiaomi Mi 9 SE comes with Android 9.0 Pie operating system.
The iPhone 11 Pro features a quite superior hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because although it has less RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit. The iPhone 11 Pro features just a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch of display, a brighter display and a quite better resolution of 1125 x 2436.
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a much better camera than iPhone 11 Pro, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality and a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE features a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro has a battery life that is just as good as the battery lifetime in Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, although the Apple iPhone 11 Pro has a 1 percent smaller battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.