Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-08-20 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone XS Max has a general score of 84.5, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro's general score of 82.7. Despite of the fact the iPhone XS Max is older and a bit heavier than the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, it's body is still thinner. IPhone XS Max has a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has a quite larger screen, a quite better resolution of 1242 x 2688, a brighter display and a little higher pixel quantity per inch of screen.
Apple iPhone XS Max features a bit faster processing unit than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has a lower number of slower cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit processor. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a superior camera than iPhone XS Max, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same aperture, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels and a way larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a very superior memory for games and applications than iPhone XS Max, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has a 26 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.