Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-08-20 | 2020-12-21 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A12, having an 82.7 score against 80.3. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro design has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy A12, but it is just a little lighter. Both devices in our current comparison include the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding operating system features.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A12, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a sharper screen than Galaxy A12, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater amount of pixels per inch of display and a way better 1080 x 2340 resolution.
Galaxy A12 counts with much more storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A12 features longer battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a superior camera than Galaxy A12, and although they both have the same resolution back camera, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a bigger aperture for better low-light images and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.