Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android |
| 2019-08-20 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | TFT |
| 403 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 has a general score of 84.7, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro's overall score of 82.7. The Galaxy A32 comes with Android OS, while Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro comes with Android 10 OS. The Galaxy A32 is a newer device than the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, although it's a little bit heavier and just a little bit thicker.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a much better display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
Galaxy A32 counts with a superior storage for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 1 TB. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro takes better photographs and videos than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a camera in the back with a 48 megapixels resolution, the same video definition and a F1.8 aperture, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has higher video frame rates.
Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with greater battery life than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.