Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-08-20 | 2019-06-20 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is just a bit better than Galaxy A60, getting an 82.7 score against 82.3. Even being the best we compare here, Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro's body is heavier and somewhat thicker than Galaxy A60. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has the previous 10 version and Galaxy A60 has Android 11.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has a just a bit lower count of pixels per inch in the display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also counts with a bit bigger display. The Samsung Galaxy A60 has as much memory to install applications and games as the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro one, both of them have equal internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a bit better processing power than Galaxy A60. Both have 6 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A60, because it has an 18 percent bigger battery size. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro takes way better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also counts with a lot larger camera sensor, a much better 48 megapixels resolution camera in the back and higher video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.