Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-08-20 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a global score of 82.7, which is slightly better than the Galaxy C9 Pro's 81 general score. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro construction is newer than the Galaxy C9 Pro's, although it's just a little heavier and noticeably thicker. These devices use Android OS, but the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has older 10 version while Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a little better hardware performance than Galaxy C9 Pro. Both have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core CPU. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a little bit larger display, a just a little higher pixel amount in each inch in the screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a lot better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a bigger camera aperture to take better images and videos in poorly lited environments, a lot better 48 megapixels resolution back-facing camera and a much better 3840x2160 video definition. Galaxy C9 Pro has just a bit more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 256 GB.
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's battery life is very similar to the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.