Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android |
| 2019-06-17 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Metal and Metal | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | TFT |
| 403 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 is just a bit better than Xiaomi Mi 9T, having an 84.7 score against 82.2. The Galaxy A32 design is newer, but just a little thicker and a little bit heavier than the Xiaomi Mi 9T. Galaxy A32 comes with Android OS, while Xiaomi Mi 9T comes with Android 10 OS. Xiaomi Mi 9T features a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Mi 9T also has more RAM.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T features a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a higher pixel count per inch in the display. Xiaomi Mi 9T captures clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A32. Both of them have the same (4K) video quality, the same video frame rates, the same resolution back facing camera and a same size aperture.
Galaxy A32 counts with much more storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A32 features superior battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.