Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-06-17 | 2019-06-20 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| Metal and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A60 has a score of 82.3, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Mi 9T's 82.2 score. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A60 has newer 11 version and Xiaomi Mi 9T has Android 10 version, offering some extra features and better performance. The Samsung Galaxy A60 construction is somewhat lighter and thinner than Xiaomi Mi 9T, although both were released only 0 months apart.
Xiaomi Mi 9T counts with a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy A60. Both have 6 GB of RAM and 8 cores. The Xiaomi Mi 9T counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy A60, because although it has a quite worse count of pixels per display inch, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Xiaomi Mi 9T also counts with a quite bigger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A60's storage capacity for games and applications is very similar to the Xiaomi Mi 9T one, both have the same internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Mi 9T shoots much better videos and photos than Galaxy A60, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Xiaomi Mi 9T also counts with a way larger sensor which offers a way better photo and video quality and a lot better resolution camera.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T has better battery performance than Galaxy A60, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.