Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-06-17 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue | Black and White |
| Metal and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9T has a score of 82.2, which is slightly better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's general score of 77.8. Despite of the fact Xiaomi Mi 9T is extremely older and much thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's construction is still lighter. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Mi 9T has the previous 10 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version.
Xiaomi Mi 9T has a very superior processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features an incredibly better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has a bigger display, a way better resolution of 2200 x 2480, a little greater amount of pixels per screen inch and a really brighter display.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a lot bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has more internal memory. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better camera than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has a bigger camera aperture to take better captures in poorly lited environments, a way larger sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and photos, a back facing camera with a better resolution and a way better 7680x4320 video definition.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better battery life than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has a 5700mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.