Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo, 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 14 |
| 2017-09-12 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.12 x 2.98 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Pink | Black and White |
| Metal | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3080mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a general score of 77.8, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi A1's 75 global score. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has the older 14 version and Xiaomi Mi A1 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a extremely newer and extremely thinner phone than Xiaomi Mi A1, but it is heavier.
Xiaomi Mi A1 has a way better hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much more vibrant display than Xiaomi Mi A1, because it has a lot brighter display, a way higher 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution, a little greater display pixel density and a really bigger display.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi A1, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a superior battery life than Xiaomi Mi A1, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures a lot better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi A1, because it has a way higher video resolution, a camera with lot more mega pixels and a lot bigger aperture for better captures and videos in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.