Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android |
| 2018-07-27 | 2021-01-22 |
| 5.88 x 2.82 x 0.34 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gold | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 435 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.8 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 has an overall score of 84.7, which is much better than the Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite's global score of 74.3. The Samsung Galaxy A32 design is newer, but somewhat heavier and a bit thicker than the Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite. Samsung Galaxy A32 works with Android OS, and Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite has Android 8.1 Oreo OS.
The Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite has a better looking screen than Galaxy A32, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much higher 1080 x 2280 resolution and a lot more pixels per inch in the display. Galaxy A32 features a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A32 also has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite and the Galaxy A32 feature similar processing units, they have 4 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit. Samsung Galaxy A32 has longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy A32 captures much better videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, because it has a much better (4K) video definition, a camera in the back with a much higher resolution and a bigger camera aperture for better photography and video in low-light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.