Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-07-27 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.88 x 2.82 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gold | Black and White |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 8 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a score of 77.8, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite's 74.3 score. Both of these phones include Android OS, but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has older 14 version while Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite has Android 8.1 Oreo version. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a a lot newer and way thinner device than the Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, although it's also heavier.
The Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite counts with a much better performing processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, because although it has a just a little worse pixels number in each display inch, it also counts with way more brightness, a way higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels and a lot bigger display.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes way better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, because it has a much higher video resolution, a much bigger camera aperture to capture better photography in low light environments and a way higher 50 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with much more storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior battery life than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.