Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-07-27 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.25 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold, Pink and Red | Black and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3010mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi A2 is just a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with a 78 score against 77.8. The Xiaomi Mi A2 is a way older and incredibly thicker cellphone than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Xiaomi was able to make it a lot lighter anyway. Xiaomi Mi A2 features a very superior processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better screen than Xiaomi Mi A2, because it has a really bigger screen, a much better 2200 x 2480px resolution and a little higher count of pixels in each display inch. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi A2, because it has more internal memory capacity.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better camera than Xiaomi Mi A2, because it has a larger camera aperture to capture better photography in low light environments, a lot higher 50 megapixels resolution camera, a lot better video resolution and a way bigger sensor. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a really longer battery duration than Xiaomi Mi A2, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity instead of 3010mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.