Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-07-24 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.04 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.13 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Blue, Gray and White | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4030mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 is just a bit better than Xiaomi Mi A3, having a global score of 81.6 against 79.2. Google Pixel 2 is an older phone than the Xiaomi Mi A3, but it is a little bit thinner and lighter anyway. Google Pixel 2 counts with a better screen than Xiaomi Mi A3, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot greater amount of pixels per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels.
The Xiaomi Mi A3 counts with a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Mi A3 also has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 256 GB. Google Pixel 2 counts with just a bit better performance than Xiaomi Mi A3. Both of them have 4 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processing unit.
Xiaomi Mi A3 has a better camera than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, a same size aperture and the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Mi A3 also has a lot higher resolution back-facing camera and a larger sensor taking better quality pictures.
The Xiaomi Mi A3 counts with a way better battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 49 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.