Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-07-24 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.04 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.13 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Blue, Gray and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4030mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ is a little bit better than Xiaomi Mi A3, with a 79.3 score against 79.2. Both phones we are comparing work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has 5.1 version and Xiaomi Mi A3 has Android 11. Although the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ is notably older than Xiaomi Mi A3, it's body is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter.
The Xiaomi Mi A3 counts with just a little better performance than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Xiaomi Mi A3 also has a higher number of cores (but slower). The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi A3, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 2560 x 1440 and way more pixels per inch of screen.
The Xiaomi Mi A3 captures better videos and photos than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Mi A3 also has a bigger camera sensor capturing better quality videos and photographs, a camera with lot more mega-pixels and a bigger camera aperture.
Xiaomi Mi A3 counts with a much greater memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 256 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Mi A3 has greater battery duration than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 34 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.