Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-07-24 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.04 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.13 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Blue, Gray and White | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4030mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi A3 has an overall score of 79.2, which is a little bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 overall score. Although the Xiaomi Mi A3 is incredibly older and way thicker than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's body is still noticeably lighter. Both phones we are comparing here have Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Mi A3 has an older 11 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version.
Xiaomi Mi A3 has a much better performing processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much more vibrant screen than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a better pixel amount per inch in the screen, a lot larger screen and a much higher resolution of 2200 x 2480.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much bigger memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi A3, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a superior camera than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a lot bigger back camera sensor taking lot better quality videos and pictures, a way better 7680x4320 video definition, a camera with a better resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior battery performance than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a 41 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.