Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.5 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2017-06-01 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.85 x 3.49 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.44 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Black and Blue |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 295.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 344 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.7 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 7.04 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo has an overall score of 77.9, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi Max 2's score of 77.5. The Motorola DROID Turbo construction is lighter than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, although it's way thicker and was released many years before. Motorola DROID Turbo has just a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster) and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit.
Motorola DROID Turbo has a much more vibrant screen than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much greater quantity of pixels per display inch and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels. The Xiaomi Mi Max 2 has a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 128 GB.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a larger aperture to take better images and videos in poorly lited environments and a much more mega-pixels camera.
Xiaomi Mi Max 2 has a way better battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 5300mAh of battery capacity.
The Motorola DROID Turbo not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.