Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.5 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2017-06-01 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.85 x 3.49 x 0.30 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.44 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Metal | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 295.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 344 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.04 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 is a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Max 2, having a overall score of 84.7 against 77.5. Galaxy A32's body is noticeably newer and just a little lighter, but thicker than the Xiaomi Mi Max 2. The Samsung Galaxy A32's processing unit is very similar to the processor in Xiaomi Mi Max 2, they have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores.
Xiaomi Mi Max 2 counts with a slightly better looking display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better display density and a higher resolution of 1080 x 1920px. Galaxy A32 features a little bit better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy A32 has a better camera than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have the same video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A32 also has a camera with way more MP and a larger aperture. Xiaomi Mi Max 2 counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A32, because it has a 6% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.