Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-06-01 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.85 x 3.49 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.44 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Black and White |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 295.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 344 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.42 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.04 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has an overall score of 77.8, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Max 2's score of 77.5. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro construction is a lot newer and incredibly thinner than Xiaomi Mi Max 2's, although it is just a little bit heavier. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way better screen than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because it has a much better resolution of 2200 x 2480px, a larger screen and a little higher pixel density.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much greater memory for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Mi Max 2 features a much powerful CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has just a bit better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because it has an 8 percent bigger battery size. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior camera than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because it has a back camera with lot more mega-pixels, a lot better 7680x4320 video quality, a lot larger camera sensor and a much larger aperture.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Xiaomi Mi Max 2. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Xiaomi Mi Max 2, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.