Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-07-19 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.94 x 3.44 x 0.31 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 350 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.2 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS Max has a global score of 84.5, which is much better than Xiaomi Mi Max 3's 74.9 global score. Even when iPhone XS Max and the Xiaomi Mi Max 3 were released with only a few months difference, iPhone XS Max is a little bit thinner and just a little lighter. The iPhone XS Max features a better looking display than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1242 x 2688 resolution and a higher pixels quantity in each display inch.
The iPhone XS Max counts with a superior hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster), and they both have 4 GB of RAM, the iPhone XS Max also counts with a 64 bits processor. The Xiaomi Mi Max 3 counts with a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Apple iPhone XS Max, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Mi Max 3 also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 256 GB.
The Xiaomi Mi Max 3 counts with a superior battery duration than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has a 5500mAh battery size instead of 3179mAh. Apple iPhone XS Max takes clearer photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, and although they both have a same resolution camera in the back, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a same size sensor, the Apple iPhone XS Max also has faster video frame rate and a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.