Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-07-19 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.94 x 3.44 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 350 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.2 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6P is a bit better than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, with a general score of 80.3 against 74.9. Despite of the fact that the Google Nexus 6P is way older than the Xiaomi Mi Max 3, it's construction is just a bit thinner and somewhat lighter. The Google Nexus 6P has a bit faster processing unit than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Google Nexus 6P features a more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The Google Nexus 6P has a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for taking photographs in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the Google Nexus 6P also counts with a more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality.
Xiaomi Mi Max 3 counts with a slightly bigger memory for games and applications than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 256 GB. The Xiaomi Mi Max 3 features a much better battery life than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 5500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.