Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-07-19 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.94 x 3.44 x 0.31 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 350 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.2 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 is just a bit better than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, having an 81.6 score against 74.9. The Google Pixel 2 body has the same thickness than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, but it is way lighter. The Google Pixel 2 counts with a bit faster processing unit than Xiaomi Mi Max 3. Both have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core CPU.
The Google Pixel 2 counts with a little sharper display than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 1920 resolution and a way smaller display, it also counts with a higher screen pixels density. The Xiaomi Mi Max 3 features a bit more memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 2, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 256 GB.
Xiaomi Mi Max 3 features a really longer battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 104% more battery capacity. The Google Pixel 2 shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Google Pixel 2 also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture and a more mega pixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.