Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-07-19 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.94 x 3.44 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic indigo |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 350 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G Stylus has a general score of 79.7, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi Max 3's general score of 74.9. These devices use Android operating system, but Motorola Moto G Stylus has an older 11 version while Xiaomi Mi Max 3 has Android 8.1 Oreo. The Motorola Moto G Stylus design is newer and lighter than the Xiaomi Mi Max 3's, but it is somewhat thicker.
Moto G Stylus features just a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2300 resolution and a just a bit better pixels density. Moto G Stylus counts with a bit faster processing unit than Xiaomi Mi Max 3. Both have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores.
Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with a much better camera than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution, a larger aperture to take better captures in low-light environments and a lot larger back camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photographs.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus has a very superior memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Mi Max 3 counts with a much better battery life than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has 5500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.