Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android |
| 2018-07-19 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.94 x 3.44 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum | Metal and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 350 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 is better than the Xiaomi Mi Max 3, getting an 84.7 score against 74.9. Galaxy A32 has Android OS, while Xiaomi Mi Max 3 counts with Android 8.1 Oreo OS. The Galaxy A32 body is extremely newer and just a bit lighter, but also thicker than Xiaomi Mi Max 3. Xiaomi Mi Max 3 features a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2160, a better number of pixels per display inch and a little bit bigger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 has a bit better processor than Xiaomi Mi Max 3. Both have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM. Galaxy A32 features a superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy A32 also has an external SD slot that supports up to 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a much better camera than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light photography.
The Xiaomi Mi Max 3 counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A32, because it has a 5500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.