Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android |
| 2018-07-19 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.94 x 3.44 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Aluminum | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 350 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a global score of 90.5, which is a lot better than the Xiaomi Mi Max 3's global score of 74.9. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G's design is newer and just a little lighter than the Xiaomi Mi Max 3's, although it is just a bit thicker. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has Android OS, and Xiaomi Mi Max 3 counts with Android 8.1 Oreo OS.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher count of pixels per inch of screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. Galaxy A90 5G features a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy A90 5G counts with a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A90 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Mi Max 3 counts with better battery performance than Galaxy A90 5G, because it has 5500mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Galaxy A90 5G shoots a lot better videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with much more megapixels and a way larger back camera sensor capturing way better quality photos and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.