Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-07-19 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.94 x 3.44 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 350 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.2 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has an overall score of 77.8, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi Max 3's 74.9 general score. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has an older 14 version and Xiaomi Mi Max 3 has Android 8.1 Oreo. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a way newer phone, and it is also extremely thinner and a little bit lighter than Xiaomi Mi Max 3.
The Xiaomi Mi Max 3 has a much better performing processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 12 GB less RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better looking display than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because it has a way higher 2200 x 2480 resolution, a quite higher pixels density and a bigger display.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because it has a way more mega-pixels back camera, a larger diafragm aperture, a lot bigger camera sensor and a way higher video resolution. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because it has a 4% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.