Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| 2018-04-03 | 2017-09-22 |
| 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black and White | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 639.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 8 has an overall score of 85, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s's 83.8 global score. The Apple iPhone 8 is a much lighter and a bit thinner cellphone than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, even when they were released only a couple months apart. IPhone 8 has a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, although it has a little bit lower screen density, a way worse 750 x 1334px resolution and a way smaller display.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s and the Apple iPhone 8 both feature really similar memory capacity to install games and applications, both of them have the same internal memory capacity. The iPhone 8 has a bit superior CPU than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a lower number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
The Apple iPhone 8 captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor offering a worse image quality, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, a back-facing camera with a 12 MP resolution and the same video resolution, the Apple iPhone 8 also counts with higher 60 frames per second video frame rate.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a way better battery duration than iPhone 8, because it has a 3400mAh battery size.
Although iPhone 8 is a better device, it is more expensive than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and give up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.